Towards the end of his battle with Ted Cruz, Donald Trump
got a lot of mileage out of the claim that the GOP nominating process is “rigged”. So much mileage, in fact, that by the time
Sen. Cruz dropped out of the race, almost 60% of registered GOP voters in one
poll agreed with Trump’s contention.
So, was Trump right?
Well, yeah, sort of.
The truth is that the Republican system of primaries and
caucuses for picking a presidential nominee has been “rigged” for a long, long
time, only not in the way Trump convinced so many to believe.
The system, with its early start, long gaps
in between contests, and proportional awarding of delegates over a six month
time frame is “rigged” to favor the candidate who is best funded and who has
built the strongest campaign organization.
This is not an accident.
A big part of the GOP nominating process is designed to weed out weak
and under-funded candidates, because the Party wants the most well-funded
candidate with the strongest team of advisors and support organization to carry
its banner into the general election campaign.
In most presidential election years, the most well-funded
candidate with the strongest organization also tends to be the person who is
leading in the public opinion polls during the month of December. In fact, that has been true in every election
cycle since 1952, as I’ve chronicled in the past.
This campaign season, however, diverged somewhat from that
longstanding script in that Trump was far and away the leader in the December
polls while Jeb! still had the most money at that time, and Ted Cruz had built
the most effective organization. By
contrast, Trump had only a rudimentary shell of a campaign staff in December,
and his status as a self-funder for the primary season meant he had raised
almost no third party money for his campaign, and had none of the supporting
Super PACs that the other candidates enjoyed.
Still, it was obvious to me in December that Trump would
ultimately become the nominee because the inherent inertia of the process
itself was ultimately going to work in his favor. And it did, the long slog ultimately becoming
too expensive for all of the myriad under-funded candidates to bear by the
middle of March, and even Jeb! finally running out of other people’s money to
waste after just a few primary states had come and gone.
Kasich and Cruz were able to hang on the longest because
Kasich was just hanging around for the fun of it all and not spending much
money, and Cruz had become the last best hope for all of the establishment
types to deny Trump the nomination. But
even Sen. Cruz was forced to face reality after Indiana, as even his once-massive
war chest had been depleted by the long, hard grind.
So, is the GOP system “rigged”? Yeah, but the irony is that it was actually
rigged in Trump’s favor.
If you want to see a truly rigged system, though, all you
need to do is take a gander at the Democrats’ process, and the ways in which
the DNC has tirelessly worked to ensure that this year’s nomination was Hillary
Clinton’s for the taking. Once Hillary
had declared for the race, the DNC actively discouraged other viable candidates
from taking up the race, thus ensuring that the future Queen would only have to
run against token opposition consisting of a failed governor of Maryland named
something-O’Malley, and a 74 year-old Commie who certainly would never be able
to raise any money. Oh, yeah, and former
senator Jim Webb, who lasted about five minutes before throwing in the towel.
But the DNC went even further, scheduling the first several “debates”
between the Queen and her motley crew of challengers at times when they knew
the fewest number of people would be watching.
Because Hillary’s an awful candidate, and even her most ardent
supporters know it. Mrs. Clinton is the only candidate in memory whose polling numbers have a consistent inverse relationship to her level of public exposure, so the plan was to
hide her as much as possible from the public and press until the nomination had
been formally "rigged", er, secured.
But a funny thing happened on the way to the rigging: the 74 year-old Commie caught fire among
young people by telling them that he’d make college free for everyone, make
healthcare free, and ensure that no one had to pay off their existing college
loans, and make sure those evil rich people ended up paying for it all. By making an array of such arithmetically-challenged
promises, the Commie secured the millenial vote and was soon out-raising the
Queen every month via thousands and thousands of small donations, no doubt
funded partially via college loan funds diverted for political purposes.
But hey, no problem, because the Queen had already tied up
the support of the majority of the Democrat “Super Delegates”, and won most of
the early primaries and caucuses, thus effectively rigging her nomination
regardless of what the Commie did.
Right?
Well, yes, but at a very big cost.
See, having to face an actual well-funded opponent in turn caused the
Queen to divert from her hiding strategy, and she soon very predictably
became over-exposed to the public. The
more TV time she received, the lower her polls sagged, and the more states the
Commie began winning, to the point now that Mr. Sanders has captured 11 of the
last 14 contested states. With seven
states, including California, and 712 delegates remaining to be contested in
June, the Commie’s momentum shows no sign of letting up.
But still, because of the party’s proportional system of
awarding delegates, and the Queen’s huge lead among the Super Delegates, the
Commie has basically no chance of catching up in the race.
So, is the Democrat system “rigged”? You bet it is, and it was rigged this way after the disastrous
radical leftwing run of George McGovern in 1972 for the precise purpose of preventing
another nominee exactly like the Commie. Thus, only an indictment and subsequent perp walk can
prevent the Queen from securing the Democrat nomination. The truth is that it
has been the case all along. Everything
else on that side of the ledger has been just for show.
Sorry to burst your bubble, kids, but those loans are going
to have to be paid back, and by you, not some nameless, faceless evil rich guy. That's the way life works.
Nice analysis as usual David. I will add that if you really want to see any of the "rigged" Democrat machine in full display, take a look at the video from the Nevada convention. Just a brief explanation, they took an "early" voice vote to change the rules so that all votes would be determined by a "voice" vote, and that the chairwoman's decision on all such votes would be final and with no ability to be contested. Then, they chose to not allow 64 of Bernie's delegates to substantiate their credentials. It was truly a sham of a convention during which the "Commie's" delegates were given no voice what ever. And yes, if Hillary were to become president, the citizens of the United States views would matter just about the same as did Bernie's delegates at that convention.
ReplyDelete